Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Volume 4, Issue 3 , Pages 160-169, September 2007

A comparison of susceptibility to photodynamic treatment between endothelial and tumor cells in vitro and in vivo

  • Ronald B. Moore, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Alberta, 2D2 Walter Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, 8440-112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2B7. Tel.: +1 780 407 6330; fax: +1 780 407 6331.
  • ,
  • Zhengwen Xiao
  • ,
  • John Tulip
  • ,
  • J.D. Chapman

Department of Surgery, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 1Z2

published online 10 February 2007.

Summary 

Background

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is being widely used for treatment of cancer and non-malignant diseases. The mechanisms of phototoxicity to solid tumor are not yet completely understood. Knowledge of the inherent sensitivity of endothelial cells in comparison to tumor cells would be helpful to predict tumor response to PDT, and thereby optimize treatment protocols.

Methods and results

The intrinsic sensitivity of rodent endothelial and tumor cells to PDT was studied using an in vitro clonogenicity assay that strictly controlled for light and photosensitizer exposure, as well as cellular photosensitizer and oxygen concentration. Taking into consideration cell size, ploidy and glutathione content, no significant difference in sensitivity to phototoxicity was observed between tumor and endothelial cells. Electron microscopy studies were also conducted to examine endothelial and tumor cells for differential cellular damage following interstitial PDT of rat prostate tumor. No evidence for selective damage to endothelial cells was demonstrated.

Conclusions

Rodent tumor cells and endothelial cells are equally susceptible to Photofrin-mediated PDT damage. Sufficient photosensitizer accumulated in solid tumor seems to be one of the key factors for PDT effectiveness.

Abbreviations: BME, Eagles basal media, DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide, EMT-6, mouse mammary tumor cells, FCS, fetal calf serum, HpD, hematoporphyrin derivative, MEM, minimal essential media, PBS, phosphate buffered saline solution, PDT, photodynamic therapy, Photofrin or PII, porfimer sodium, R3327-AT, rat prostate tumor (anaplastic), SDS, sodium dodecyl sulphate, UNA-ME, mouse endothelial cells

Keywords: Endothelial cells, Photodynamic therapy (PDT), Photofrin, Prostate tumor

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1572-1000(07)00003-8

doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2006.12.003

Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Volume 4, Issue 3 , Pages 160-169, September 2007