Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Volume 4, Issue 2 , Pages 95-99, June 2007

Microvascular effects of Photofrin®-induced photodynamic therapy

  • Cheng-Jen Chang, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, and Department of Plastic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 199, Tung Hwa North Road, Taipei, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +886 2 27135211x3502; fax: +886 2 25140600.
  • ,
  • Sally M.H. Cheng

      Affiliations

    • School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • J. Stuart Nelson

      Affiliations

    • Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA

published online 10 May 2007.

Summary 

Background and objective

The object of our study is to evaluate the feasibility of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for complicated hemangiomas. The photosensitizing activities of Photofrin® have been used in vivo models for our goal of evaluation.

Study design/materials and methods

The in vivo biological activities of Photofrin® exposed to the total laser energy density of 100J/cm2 with the power density of 100 or 120mW/cm2 at 630nm wavelength was studied. The amount of vascular damage produced in the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) was evaluated. At 630nm wavelength, those individual vessels with a diameter of 40μm or less and those with a diameter between 40 and 100μm were treated with Photofrin® at a concentration of about 2.5mg/mL, and injected intraperitoneally at 2.5mg/kg, illuminated at 100 and 120mW/cm2, respectively. Both exhibited coagulation.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (100 and 120mW/cm2) on vessel damage grade 1. With vessel damage grades 2 and 3, the differences were statistically significant between two groups. Vessel damages between arterioles and venules also demonstrated differences in the 100mW/cm2 treated group but not in the 120mW/cm2 group. Statistically significant differences were also shown in arteriole and venules damage between 100 and 120mW/cm2 treated groups. The severity of vessel damage between grades 1 and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3, were compared. The differences were statistically significant in 100mW/cm2 treated group. There was no statistically significant difference in 120mW/cm2 treated group.

Conclusion

Photofrin® has the capabilities for destruction of microvascular vessels of CAM. Extension of this study to the second-generation photosensitizers is underway. The most important treatment variables seem to be the power density.

Keywords: Photodynamic therapy, Photofrin®, Chick chorioallantoic membrane

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1572-1000(07)00036-1

doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2007.03.003

Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Volume 4, Issue 2 , Pages 95-99, June 2007