Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Volume 4, Issue 3 , Pages 197-201, September 2007

Comparison of aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-thermogel-PDT with methyl-ALA-thermogel-PDT in basal cell carcinoma

  • Peter Schleier, PdD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Maxillofacial Surgery/Plastic Surgery, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Orofacial Surgery, University of Stavanger, Armauer Hansensvei 20, 4017 Stavanger, Norway. Tel.: +47 515183555; fax: +47 51518337.
  • ,
  • Alexander Berndt

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Pathology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany
  • ,
  • Susann Kolossa

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Erfurt, Germany
  • ,
  • Witold Zenk

      Affiliations

    • Department of Maxillofacial Surgery/Plastic Surgery, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany
  • ,
  • Peter Hyckel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Maxillofacial Surgery/Plastic Surgery, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany
  • ,
  • Stefan Schultze-Mosgau

      Affiliations

    • Department of Maxillofacial Surgery/Plastic Surgery, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany

published online 28 July 2007.

Summary 

Background

Aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and light irradiation is a treatment option in basal cell carcinomas (BCC). The development of ALA-esters with potential for greater penetration depth promises higher therapeutic success. In a pilot study, we hypothesized that the cytotoxic effect of methyl-ALA (mALA) photodynamic therapy (PDT) leads to a higher success rate compared with ALA-PDT when both are topically applied in a thermogel.

Methods

Twenty-four patients with 112 superficial BCC were treated with either 10% ALA- or mALA-thermogel. After an accumulation time of at least 3h, the lesions were illuminated with a diode laser. The power density was 0.1W/cm2 and the energy density was 120J/cm2. After intervals of 12 weeks and 6 months, the therapeutic efficacy was assessed by clinical examination.

Results

Sixty percent of the tumors were treated successfully in the first session. All but 3% of the remaining tumors could be treated with a second or third course of therapy.

Conclusion

Although mALA should have a greater penetration depth, the therapeutic outcome of this preliminary study showed no difference between treatments. The final proof of this preliminary result will require further study.

Keywords: Photodynamic therapy, Basal cell carcinomas, Therapeutic success, Aminolevulinic acid, Methylated aminolevulinic acid, Topical thermogel application

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1572-1000(07)00064-6

doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2007.04.004

Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Volume 4, Issue 3 , Pages 197-201, September 2007