Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Volume 5, Issue 4 , Pages 276-284, December 2008

Pharmacokinetic modeling of motexafin gadolinium disposition in mouse tissues using optical pharmacokinetic system measurements

  • Stephen C. Kanick, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh School of Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States
  • ,
  • Julie L. Eiseman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
    • Molecular Therapeutics and Drug Discovery Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
  • ,
  • Robert S. Parker, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh School of Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States
    • Molecular Therapeutics and Drug Discovery Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering, 1249 Benedum Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.

published online 27 January 2009.

Summary 

Clinical use of radio- or photo-sensitizing agents in anti-cancer treatments may be limited by patient specific variability in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the sensitizing compound. Previously, our group reported motexafin gadolinium (MGd) concentrations in mouse tissues measured noninvasively by the optical pharmacokinetic system (OPS) in vivo, nondestructively by OPS in situ, and destructively by HPLC ex vivo. This study utilized those reported data to develop compartmental PK models of MGd disposition in plasma, tumor, and skin. The model predicted both the rapid initial distribution and slow elimination phases of MGd in plasma, the fast transport of MGd out of the skin (with no MGd detectable after 120min), and MGd retention at long times in the tumor (with detectable MGd at 24h). The same compartmental structure was used to model MGd concentrations vs. time as measured by OPS in situ and HPLC ex vivo. In vivo tumor MGd concentrations measured using OPS were estimated by a linear combination of the model predicted PK profiles in plasma and tumor tissue, which suggests that tissue-specific PK knowledge may be needed in order to interpret volume-averaged optical measurements in vivo. The PK modeling techniques presented here are extensible to other optically active compounds and, potentially, to the development of patient-specific treatment schedules.

Keywords: Biomedical optics, Optical pharmacokinetic system (OPS), Elastic-scattering spectroscopy, Pharmacokinetics, Compartmental model

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1572-1000(08)00107-5

doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2008.11.005

Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Volume 5, Issue 4 , Pages 276-284, December 2008