Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Volume 5, Issue 4 , Pages 238-246, December 2008

Current indications and future perspective of fluorescence bronchoscopy: A review study

  • K. Moghissi

      Affiliations

    • The Yorkshire Laser Centre, Goole, UK
  • ,
  • Kate Dixon, BA Hons

      Affiliations

    • The Yorkshire Laser Centre, Goole, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: The Yorkshire Laser Centre, Goole & District Hospital, Woodland Avenue, Goole, East Yorkshire DN14 6RX, UK. Tel.: +44 1724 290456; fax: +44 1724 290456.
  • ,
  • M.R. Stringer

      Affiliations

    • The Yorkshire Laser Centre, Goole, UK
    • The Institute of Microwaves & Photonics, University of Leeds, UK

published online 24 February 2009.

Summary 

Background

Autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB) was introduced into clinical practice early in the 1990s for identification and localisation of intra-epithelial pre-neoplastic (dysplastic mucosa) and early neoplastic (carcinoma in situ) endobronchial lesions.

Objectives

to determine the current range of indications of AFB through review of published literature and to compare sensitivity and specificity of AFB with those of WLB for identification of pre- and early neoplastic lesions in each of the indications.

Method

Search of the literature produced 62 eligible articles for the review. These were “empirically” classified into five categories:

1.AFB for identification and localisation of early neoplastic changes.

2.AFB for identification and localisation of bronchial neoplastic changes in smokers.

3.AFB for monitoring treatment and surveillance of early neoplastic changes.

4.AFB for identification and localisation of synchronous and multi-focal lesions.

5.AFB used as a tool for lung cancer screening.

Results

In all categories the sensitivity of AFB was several times greater than WLB in identifying pre-neoplastic and early neoplastic lesions and the specificity of WLB was higher than that of AFB. When AFB was used for identification and localisation of dysplasia and carcinoma in situ its sensitivity was 25–47% (mean 33%) higher than that of WLB. Its specificity was 7–18% (mean 11%) lower than WLB.

The ratio of sensitivity of AFB/WLB was highest in every category when the population tested comprised a higher proportion of pre- and early neoplastic lesions than invasive cancer. In such cases there was relatively lower specificity for AFB compared to WLB.

Conclusion

The review suggests that AFB should be included in routine investigations of patients suspected of having lung cancer, those undergoing lung cancer surgery and in post-treatment follow-up to discover early cancer and/or recurrence. Also, it has to be included in any screening programme protocol.

Keywords: Autofluorescence bronchoscopy indications, Autofluorescence and white light bronchoscopy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1572-1000(09)00009-X

doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2009.01.008

Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Volume 5, Issue 4 , Pages 238-246, December 2008