Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Volume 6, Issue 3 , Pages 170-188, September 2009

Photodynamic therapy for localized infections—State of the art

  • Tianhong Dai

      Affiliations

    • Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
    • Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
  • ,
  • Ying-Ying Huang

      Affiliations

    • Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
    • Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
    • Aesthetic and Plastic Center of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, PR China
  • ,
  • Michael R. Hamblin, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
    • Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
    • Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: 40 Blossom Street, BAR414, Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114-2696, United States. Tel.: +1 617 726 6182; fax: +1 617 726 8566.

published online 19 November 2009.

Summary 

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was discovered over 100 years ago by observing the killing of microorganisms when harmless dyes and visible light were combined in vitro. Since then it has primarily been developed as a treatment for cancer, ophthalmologic disorders and in dermatology. However, in recent years interest in the antimicrobial effects of PDT has revived and it has been proposed as a therapy for a large variety of localized infections. This revival of interest has largely been driven by the inexorable increase in drug resistance among many classes of pathogen. Advantages of PDT include equal killing effectiveness regardless of antibiotic resistance, and a lack of induction of PDT resistance. Disadvantages include the cessation of the antimicrobial effect when the light is turned off, and less than perfect selectivity for microbial cells over host tissue. This review will cover the use of PDT to kill or inactivate pathogens in ex vivo tissues and in biological materials such as blood. PDT has been successfully used to kill pathogens and even to save life in several animal models of localized infections such as surface wounds, burns, oral sites, abscesses and the middle ear. A large number of clinical studies of PDT for viral papillomatosis lesions and for acne refer to its antimicrobial effect, but it is unclear how important this microbial killing is to the overall therapeutic outcome. PDT for periodontitis is a rapidly growing clinical application and other dental applications are under investigation. PDT is being clinically studied for other dermatological infections such as leishmaniasis and mycobacteria. Antimicrobial PDT will become more important in the future as antibiotic resistance is only expected to continue to increase.

Keywords: Photodynamic therapy, Photosensitizer, Localized infection, Bacteria, Virus, Fungus, Skin, Wound, Burn

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1572-1000(09)00141-0

doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2009.10.008

Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Volume 6, Issue 3 , Pages 170-188, September 2009