Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Volume 7, Issue 1 , Pages 3-9, March 2010

A dedicated applicator for light delivery and monitoring of PDT of intra-anal intraepithelial neoplasia

  • Bastiaan Kruijt

      Affiliations

    • Center for Optical Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Eric M. van der Snoek

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Henricus J.C.M. Sterenborg

      Affiliations

    • Center for Optical Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Arjen Amelink

      Affiliations

    • Center for Optical Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Dominic J. Robinson, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Optical Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Center for Optical Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC., Room Ee-1675, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 107032141.

published online 22 February 2010.

Summary 

The objective of this study was to develop an applicator for delivery of light and monitoring of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the anal cavity for treatment of anal intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (AIN III), which can progress to invasive anal cancer.

Forty-eight hours before treatment, patients participating in the study were injected with 0.03 (n=2) or 0.075 (n=2)mgkg−1 m-THPC. For light delivery and monitoring of PDT, an applicator based on standard anoscopy equipment was developed which facilitates, in addition to a light treatment fiber, fiber optic probes to monitor blood saturation, blood volume, fluorescence and fluence (rate) at two different locations in situ. Patients were given a light dose of 10–17Jcm−2 at a fluence rate of 45–50mWcm−2 based on in situ measured light treatment parameters.

We demonstrate that the applicator does not influence the fluence rate profile of the light treatment fiber. Furthermore this study shows the possibility of monitoring blood saturation, blood volume, fluorescence and fluence (rate) during therapeutic illumination without changing the light treatment protocol.

Keywords: m-THPC, Fluorescence spectroscopy, Reflectance spectroscopy, AIN III, Optical diagnostics and photodynamic therapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1572-1000(10)00007-4

doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2010.01.006

Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Volume 7, Issue 1 , Pages 3-9, March 2010